Whether Hardin v. Straub is relevant to the Supreme Court's holdings

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED #1. Whether Hardin v. Straub, 490 U.S. 536, 109 S.Ct. (1998), 104 L.Ed 2d 582, 57 USLW 4554 is relevant pursuant to United States Supreme Court, Justice Stevens and the (1989) majoritys . holdings? . #2. Whether the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals was obligated to take into consideration and follow this United States Supreme Courts (1998) majoritys holdings pursuant to: Hardin v. Straub, 490 U.S. 536, 109 S.Ct. (1998)?? #3. Whether the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, State (Spokane), was obligated to take into : consideration and follow this United States Supreme Courts (1998), majoritys holdings pursuant to: Hardin v. Straub, 490 U.S. 536, . 109 S.ct. (1998)??? #4, Whether both the U.S. District Court for the Eastern Bistrict of Washington, State and the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals caused a circuit split that is contrary to this United States Supreme Courts (1998) majoritys holdings and sheperdized case[s] pursuant to Justice Stevens holdings in: Hardin v. Straub, 490 U.S. 536, 109 S.Ct. (1998), when they deprived Petitioner of federal constitutional rights and dismissed the attempted murder unjuries complaint with prejudice as being "time-barred", in clear violation and disrespect of cited and argued: Hardin v. Straub, 490 U.S. 536, 109 S.Ct. (1998)?2?? | , (ii) . ; : Gg