No. 22-6448
Rickey Thompson v. United States
IFP
Tags: case-review civil-rights compelling-circumstances compelling-reasons due-process extraordinary-circumstances extraordinary-reasons judicial-discretion legal-standard petitioner-relief relief standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-06-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether extraordinary and compelling reasons exist in granting Petitioner relief in this case?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether extraordinary and compelling reasons exist in granting Petitioner relief in this case?
Docket Entries
2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-30
Petitioner reply brief filed. (Received 6/13/2023)
2023-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-05
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2023-04-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 5, 2023.
2023-03-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 5, 2023 to May 5, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 5, 2023.
2023-03-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 6, 2023 to April 5, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 6, 2023.
2023-02-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 3, 2023 to March 6, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent