No. 22-645
Blanca Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law agency-deference appellate-mandates appellate-procedure civil-procedure compliance due-process false-statements federal-agencies judicial-deference judicial-review
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-02-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether federal agencies are exempted from the rule requiring strict compliance with appellate mandates
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether federal agencies are exempted from the rule requiring strict compliance with appellate mandates. Whether judicial deference to federal agencies includes deference to material false statements.
Docket Entries
2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent Federal Communications Commission, et al. to respond filed.
2023-01-16
Supplemental brief of petitioner Blanca Telephone Company filed.
2023-01-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 10, 2023)
Attorneys
Blanca Telephone Company
Timothy Edward Welch — Hill & Welch, Petitioner
Timothy Edward Welch — Hill & Welch, Petitioner
Federal Communications Commission, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent