No. 22-6454

Christine Chang v. Ezery Beauchamp, Captain and Commander for California Highway Patrol, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-01-04
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 42-usc-1983 abuse-of-discretion civil-rights dismissal dismissal-with-prejudice due-process fourteenth-amendment ninth-circuit pro-se section-1983
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit violates Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due process rights

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit violates Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment due process rights when it decides in a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 ; that the district court has not abused discretion vacates all four deprives Pro Se Petitioner from argue points/submit evidence/testify issues, and dismisses the case without leave to amend and with prejudice, in conflict with many decisions of this Court, circuit courts including Ninth Circuit, and state supreme courts. Whether the District Court abuses discretion dismisses all civil rights actions, in Second Amended Complaint (SAC) under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, without leave to amend and with prejudice based on Rule 12(b) (6), in conflict with decisions of this Court, Ninth Circuit, and California Supreme Court, in violation of Petitioner's due process rights of Fourteenth Amendment and of Fourth Amendment. Whether the District Court abuses discretion dismisses all viable state law causes of action, in First Amended Complaint (FAC), without leave to amend and with prejudice based on Cal. Gov. Immunity Code Sec. 821.6, which is waived by the Civil Rights Act 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, Cal. Tort Claims Act 911.2, and Cal. Gov. Code Sections 822.2, 815.2(a), 815.3 (a) (b) (©), 820.4, and 820.8. ° (i)

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-20
Waiver of right of respondent Ezery Beauchamp, et al. to respond filed.
2022-08-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2023)

Attorneys

Christine Chang
Christine Chang — Petitioner
Christine Chang — Petitioner
Ezery Beauchamp, et al.
Janill L. RichardsOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Janill L. RichardsOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent