No. 22-6459
Lenroy McLean v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure government-misconduct government-review procedural-motion section-2255 section-3504 statutory-interpretation wiretapping
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 procedure qualifies as a Proceeding under 18 U.S.C. § 3504(a)(1)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Whether the Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 procedure qualifies as a Proceeding under 18 U.S.C. § 3504(a)(1) to merit an affirmance or denial by the Government prior to disposing claims of fraud during § 2255 proceedings II. Does victim of unlawful wiretapping conducted at the direction of the Government | invoke 18 U.S.C. § 3504 absent the Government's sworn affidavit denying the allegation i
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-12-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent