No. 22-6461
Segundo Marcial Dominguez-Caicedo and Adrian Andres Cortez-Quinonez v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: arrest arrest-delay criminal-procedure due-process high-seas judicial-proceedings magistrate-review speedy-trial transportation transportation-time unnecessary-delay
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-06-08
(distributed 3 times)
Related Cases:
22-6409
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the additional delay resulting from transportation to the district the Government chooses to prosecute must be considered when determining whether the individual was taken before a magistrate judge 'without unnecessary delay'
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Upon an arrest on the high seas, is the additional delay resulting from transportation to the district the Government chooses to prosecute a factor that must be considered when determining whether the individual was taken before a magistrate judge “without unnecessary delay”? prefix
Docket Entries
2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-26
Rescheduled.
2023-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-12
Reply of petitioner Segundo Marcial Dominguez-Caicedo, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2023-05-01
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-03-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 1, 2023.
2023-03-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 31, 2023 to May 1, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 31, 2023.
2023-02-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 1, 2023 to March 31, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-30
Response Requested. (Due March 1, 2023)
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-12-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2023)
Attorneys
Segundo Marcial Dominguez-Caicedo, et al.
Zandra Lopez — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
Zandra Lopez — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent