No. 22-6465
Jess Richard Smith v. Washington
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process federal-law jurisdiction post-conviction state-court stay witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2023-02-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state court has decided an important question of federal law under the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \) Whether the state cough has | deUded 2 imeertauct gueshen ot LAW Under Khe Lue process | | clause. o& khe Lanites States . . | Censtitotten) as Xe wahether — , Khe Washington Court of Apres, : Div One, and Loashugten Svoreme. | Court, Can" STAY" post cansletion proceedings and laxer de Laut . ime bas, The “StTAYED" Rost cenvietion pce lecding 2 2) Whether the Las hing ben oe Sveceme Court Commissis ens, wed otf andre Lnred Comprehension, dekiurition, of the. Lorik ‘STAY q. . Ws wis interpreted: AS "rest . calling" ec & Waulted « ? : &
Docket Entries
2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-02-01
Waiver of right of respondent State of Washington to respond filed.
2022-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2023)
Attorneys
State of Washington
Amy R. Meckling — King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Respondent
Amy R. Meckling — King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Respondent