No. 22-6465

Jess Richard Smith v. Washington

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2023-01-05
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process federal-law jurisdiction post-conviction state-court stay witness-testimony
Latest Conference: 2023-02-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the state court has decided an important question of federal law under the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED \) Whether the state cough has | deUded 2 imeertauct gueshen ot LAW Under Khe Lue process | | clause. o& khe Lanites States . . | Censtitotten) as Xe wahether — , Khe Washington Court of Apres, : Div One, and Loashugten Svoreme. | Court, Can" STAY" post cansletion proceedings and laxer de Laut . ime bas, The “StTAYED" Rost cenvietion pce lecding 2 2) Whether the Las hing ben oe Sveceme Court Commissis ens, wed otf andre Lnred Comprehension, dekiurition, of the. Lorik ‘STAY q. . Ws wis interpreted: AS "rest . calling" ec & Waulted « ? : &

Docket Entries

2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-02-01
Waiver of right of respondent State of Washington to respond filed.
2022-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2023)

Attorneys

Jess Richard Smith
Jess R. Smith — Petitioner
Jess R. Smith — Petitioner
State of Washington
Amy R. MecklingKing County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Respondent
Amy R. MecklingKing County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Respondent