No. 22-6473

Michael Dewayne Dennis v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-01-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment privacy privacy-rights reasonable-expectation-of-privacy search sentencing-disparities surveillance warrantless-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-06-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-long-term-police-use-of-a-surveillance-camera-is-a-fourth-amendment-search

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Question No. One Whether long-term police use of a surveillance camera targeted at a person’s home and curtilage is a Fourth Amendment search. Question No. 2 Whether the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment provides sufficient grounds to justify discrete discovery of certain relevant conduct information in Presentence Reports of a to protect against disparate sentencing ii

Docket Entries

2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-05
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentCertificate of Word Count
2023-03-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 5, 2023.
2023-03-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 7, 2023 to May 5, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-02-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 7, 2023.
2023-02-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 8, 2023 to April 7, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-02-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 8, 2023.
2023-02-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 6, 2023 to March 8, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentMain Document
2022-12-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2023)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisOtherPetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountOtherProof of Service

Attorneys

Michael Dennis
John Finbar Carroll — Petitioner
John Finbar Carroll — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent