No. 22-6475

Nohe Dominguez-Morales v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-01-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: almendarez-torres apprendi apprendi-v-new-jersey criminal-procedure historical-practices notice-clause prior-conviction-exception prior-convictions sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-06-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the prior-conviction exception from Almendarez-Torres can be squared with the text of the Sixth Amendment's Notice Clause and the historical practices it codified

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented is: Whether the prior-conviction exception from Almendarez-Torres can be squared with the text of the Sixth Amendment’s Notice Clause and the historical practices it codified. I. The text and history are clear. In the Founding Era and immediately afterward, courts, prosecutors, and defendants in England and America treated the fact of a prior conviction necessary to satisfy a statutory recidivism enhancement as an element of an aggravated crime to be alleged in the indictment and proved to a jury at trial. The text of the Notice Clause codified this common-law practice. A crime’s “nature” included all allegations necessary to distinguish one statutory offense from another. The second question presented is: Whether, in light of the historical record, Almendarez-Torres should be overruled. i

Docket Entries

2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-18
Reply of petitioner Nohe Dominguez-Morales filed.
2023-05-08
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-04-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 8, 2023.
2023-04-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 17, 2023 to May 8, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 17, 2023.
2023-03-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 17, 2023 to April 17, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-15
Response Requested. (Due March 17, 2023)
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 6, 2023)

Attorneys

Nohe Dominguez-Morales
Taylor Wills Edwards BrownFederal Public Defender, N.D. Tex., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent