Hanan Shiheiber v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Whether the ownership of a former Washington Mutual mortgage is a question of fact
QUESTIONS PRESENTED The fraud of various banks that occurred during the mortgage foreclosure crisis was exacerbated during the COVID-19 epidemic. This case presents the Court with the opportunity to lay out the rules of law that should be followed by courts in these cases and to resolve many of the outstanding issues, in which there is substantial conflict: 1. Washington Mutual, FSB, was dissolved by the FDIC and the FDIC agreed to sell to Chase many of Washington Mutual’s loans, but some courts have concluded that Chase purchased all of the loans, even though, as in this case, the IRS concluded that Petitioner’s mortgage was not included. Thus, the question is whether the ownership of a former Washington Mutual mortgage is a question of fact. 2. Whether Chase committed numerous violations of federal and state law such that it should be estopped from foreclosing on Petitioner’s property. i