No. 22-6482

David John Thistle v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-01-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: article-v article-v-violation civil-rights constitution-amendment constitutional-amendment domestic-terrorism due-process election-tampering federal-officers
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-03-03 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

When Federal Elected or Appointed Officers of Federal or State Governments within the United States are aware of the unauthorized illegal changes to Article 1 Sec 2Par 2 without the due process of Law as required by Article V of the Constitution before an Election for U.S. Representatives

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented | When Federal Elected or Appointed Officers of Federal or State Governments within the United States are aware of the unauthorized illegal changes to Article 1 Sec 2Par 2 without the due process of Law as required by Article V of the Constitution before an Election for U.S. Representatives a clear and present imminent danger presents itself before “The People.” These Violations in question include by design . and nature both Constitutional Questions and Civil Rights Violations of both individual Citizens and Cohorts of disenfranchised Citizens. The knowingly editing or altering of the Constitution in any pen by additions or truncations to alter the Spirit of the intentions of the Founding Fathers and the definition form to limit otherwise qualified Ballot Candidates from Office or proper ability to campaign for office without due process in accordance with Article V by States’ sworn Elected or Appointed Officers in their Positions of Public Trust is a clear Violation of Article V, the X and XIV Amendments as well as other Laws of the Nation to not limited to but including elements of 18 U.S.C., 20 U.S.C., 28 U.S.C., 42 U.S.C., and the Federal Judges Cannon. This case provides concrete irrefutable evidence of Elections Tampering and lack of action to correct by sworn and/or affirmed States’ Officers and Federal Officers of the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, and the Judicial Branch. This “lack of action to correct” is a direct Violation of the XIV Amendment and other Federal . and States’ Laws for Election Tampering and may be considered by both the Department of Justice and “The People” as Domestic Terrorism. . The unchecked unauthorized illegal editing or altering of any Article or Amendment within the Constitution of the United States by sworn Elected or Appointed States’ or Federal Officers without immediate unbiased fair and equal distribution of the law and proper corrective action and Justice, allows for a continuance of the unauthorized illegal altering of any and all line items of the Constitution and may lead to the loss of all Civil Rights and Liberties granted to “The People” by the Constitution. This unauthorized editing or altering of the Constitution : of the United States without due process in accordance with Article V by sworn and/or affirmed Elected or Appointed Officers of the States or Federal Government may justify a Revolutionary War or Insurrection and the dissolvement of the Union of the United States. Understanding seriousness of the aforementioned, will this Supreme Court allow the sworn and/or affirmed State’s Officers ora grouping of States’ Officers with the knowledge of sworn and/or affirmed Federal Officers of any Branch of Government edit or alter the Constitution of the United States in any way without the due process in accordance with Article V to continue unchecked and unpunished thereby tainting the entirety of the Constitution of the United States?

Docket Entries

2023-04-13
Case considered closed.
2023-03-29
Application (22A847) denied by Justice Kagan.
2023-03-25
Application (22A847) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of March 6, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2023-03-06
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 27, 2023, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2023-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/3/2023.
2023-02-08
Waiver of right of respondents Biden, President of the United States, Joseph R., et al. to respond filed.
2023-02-03
Waiver of right of respondent State of Alaska to respond filed.
2023-01-30
Waiver of right of respondent Alabama Attorney General to respond filed.
2023-01-09
Motion (22M58) for leave to proceed as a veteran Denied.
2022-12-21
MOTION (22M58) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-13
Motion (22M58) for leave to proceed as a veteran filed.
2022-12-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 8, 2023)

Attorneys

Alabama Attorney General
Edmund Gerard LaCour Jr.Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Edmund Gerard LaCour Jr.Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Biden, President of the United States, Joseph R., et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
David John Thistle
David John Thistle — Petitioner
David John Thistle — Petitioner
State of Alaska
Charles Edmond BrasingtonState of Alaska Department of Law, Respondent
Charles Edmond BrasingtonState of Alaska Department of Law, Respondent