No. 22-6487
Chasity Reanee Orellana v. United States
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court due-process jurisdiction post-release-conduct revocation sentencing supervised-release
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred by revoking Ms. Orellana's supervised release because its revocation decision relied on conduct that occurred after her term of supervised release ended
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the district court erred by revoking Ms. Orellana’s supervised release because its revocation decision relied on conduct that occurred after her term of supervised release ended. i
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 8, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent