Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does an individual who has been diagnosed with a state created psychological disorder have a right to treatment equal to those who the medical community has diagnosed for conventional psychological treatment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Lonnie Kade Welsh was civilly committed as a sexually violent predator under a State of Texas mental illness. This illness distinguished him from those who can be | held morally blameworthy in the state. He then went to prison for over a year and a half until he was fully acquitted, by the Court of Appeals. The State petitioned for review which was declined by the Texas Supreme Court. Lonnie Kade Welsh was released 33 days later after the lower court certified its order. The question presented are as follows: 1. Does an individual who has been diagnosed with a state created psychological disorder have a right to treatment equal to those who the medical community has diagnosed for conventional psychological treatment? 2. Ifa person is acquitted of false criminal charges and the highest court in state has declined review what is a reasonable time for release from the prison? . ,
2023-05-15
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2023-04-25
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-06
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2023-03-20
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2023-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-16
Waiver of right of respondent Bryan Collier, et al. to respond filed.
2023-02-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 10, 2023.
2023-02-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 8, 2023 to March 10, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-12-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 8, 2023)