Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is using its procedural bar rules in a manner inconsistent with the United States Constitution and with its own precedent

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. IS THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ; ELEVENTH CIRCULT USING ITS PROCEDURAL BAR RULES IN A MANNER INCONSISTENT WITH THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND WITH ITS OWN PRECEDENT? . Il. :/)WHETHER PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXONERATE DUE TO LACK OF JURISDICTION WAS TIME BARRED? III. WHETHER PETITIONER'S 1,380 MONTH SENTENCE OF IMPRISONMENT IS UNREASONABLE (GREATER THAN NECESSARY) TO SERVE THE PURPOSE OF SENTENCING , UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 18 U.S.C. §3553(a)? ' ‘TABLE OF. AUTHORITIES CITED CASES a PAGE NO. . SUPREME COURT Ses oe : Arizona Christian School Tuition Ore. v. Winn, 562 US 125, : I3L §.Ct 1436, 179 L.Ed.2d 523 (201T).~. tose ee we 68, 15 Dean v. U.S., 581 US » 137 S.Ct 1170, 197 L.Ed.2d: 490 ; @017).0..20228: ee eee ee ee 24 Gall v. U.S., 552 US 41, 49-50 ©... eg Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, 583 US “ . 138 §.Ct 13, 199 L-Ed.?4 249 (2017) 2 Ow TT 8 Henderson v.. Shinseki;. 562 US 1428, 434; 131: S.Ct 1197, °°. rae 179 LYEd.2d.159 (2011). ... 4. ee ww ae ee oe LL 118,119 Holguin-Hernandez v. U.S., 589 US » 140 S.Ct 762, 2: 206 L.Ed.2d 95 (2020) ...77.. se ee we ww we 24 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 US 307, 99 S.ct 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 ~ CIU72ET9T9)Y ee ke a 19 Kimbrough v. U.S., 552 US 85, 128 S.Ct 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2008) So ek elt eee eee ee 20 Kontrick v. Ryan, 540 US 443, 455, 124 $.ct 906, 157 L.Ed.2¢a BT BOON ee oe 2067 157 LeBd.2d Louisville‘& Nashville Railroad Co. v. Motle ,» 211 US 149, 29°8.Ct 42, 53 L.Ed 129 (1908) >. see ewe 8 Pepper v. U.S., 562 US 476, 491, 493, 131 S.ct 1229, 179 L.Ed.2d 196° (2011)... ...0.004,4 + + + « 24, 29, 30 Strirone v. U.S., 361 US 212, 217, 80 S.Ct 270, 4 L.Ed.2d 252 “(1960) -. soe ee ee we ew LL, 14, 219 Sullivan v. Ashe, 302 US 51,55458'S.Cti:5982 LIEd.43 (19379843) 29 Thom son _v. Louisville, 362 US 199, 801.S.6t7 624 544 L.Ed.2d . U.S. Addonizio, 442 US 198, 99 6.€t.2235 (1979) . 2... 2. 17 U.S. v. Booker, 543 US 220, 268.6262, 125 S.ct 738, 1G %, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005)... ek . 8 24 _ . COURT OF APPEALS U.S. Alfaro-Moncada, 607 F.3d 720, 735 (11th Cir. 2010) oe 25 US:vvBrown, 2020 U.S.App.LEXIS 28688 (llth Cir. 2020) ., 24 U.S.v. Brown, 7 F.3d 1155 (Sth Cir. 1993) . 413 U.S. v. Canders, 417 F.3d 958 (8th Cir. 2008)... . 2... 12 U.S. v. Dell, 710-F.3d 1267, 1279 (11th Cir. 2013) se eee 20 U.S. v. Kolla, 819 Fed.Appx 739 (llth Cir. 2020) . 24 U.S. v. Macli, 842 Fed.Appx 549 (llth Cir. 2021) . oe 27 U.S. v. Martin, 747 F.2d 1104 (1lth Cir. 1994) see e « 9, 12 U.S. v. Peter, 310 F.3d 709, 712-13 (llth Cir. 2002) . = -20 CONTINUATION PAGE