No. 22-6507

In Re Michael Kenny Carter

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-01-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: a.e.d.p.a. aedpa civil-rights congressional-authority due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus innocence innocence-claim procedural-barrier writ-suspension
Key Terms:
ERISA HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the A.E.D.P.A. second or successive provision unconstitutionally suspension of the writ of habeas corpus, as applied to incarcerated individuals who are innocent and can prove it, but procedural obstacles, like the second or successive bar is a barrier for relief?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Is the A.E.D.P.A. second or successive provision unconstitutionally suspension of the writ of habeas corpus, as ; applied to incarcerated individuals who are innocent and can prove it, but procedural obstacles, like the second or successive bar is a barrier for relief? 2) Can federal courts allow an innocent American to remain in prison because of a procedural barrier like A.E.D.P:A. second or successive provision? 3) Did Congress exceed their authority by implementing the A.E.D.P.A.? 4) Is the A.E.D.P.A. unconstitutional as applied to Carter? i .

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2022-11-07

Attorneys

In re: Michael Carter
Michael Kenny Carter — Petitioner
Michael Kenny Carter — Petitioner