No. 22-6509
Roosevelt Mondesir v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: §2254-petition 28-usc-2254 federal-habeas federal-review habeas-corpus judicial-interpretation reasonableness-review state-court-decision state-court-decisions wilson-v-sellers
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the 11th U.S. Circuit Court err in interpreting Wilson v. Sellers to allow federal habeas courts to consider justifications not provided by the state court?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Did the 11 U.S. Circuit Court err when it interpreted your holding in Wilson y. Sellers, 138 S.Ct. 1188 (2018) to mean that “in assessing the reasonableness of a State court’s ultimate decision, federal habeas court is not required to strictly limit its review to particular justifications that the State court provided” and may turn to justifications that the State court never even hinted at to affirm a denial of a §2254 petition? i
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-12
Waiver of right of respondent Dixon, Sec., FL DOC to respond filed.
2023-01-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 10, 2023)
Attorneys
Dixon, Sec., FL DOC
Celia A. Terenzio — Respondent
Roosevelt Mondesir
Roosevelt Mondesir — Petitioner