Whether West Covina v. Perkins, 525 U.S. 234 (1999) should be the driving precedent where a state has enacted a statute requiring notice of remedies, and whether the reviewing court erred in basing its decision on West Covina given the existence of a statute requiring notice of remedies

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED West Covina v. Perkins, 525 U.S. 234 (1999) addressed circumstances in which "not one State or the Federal Government has seen fit to require" a notice of remedies. Where a state has enacted a statute requiring a notice of remedies, should West Covina, Id be the driving precedent? And, did the reviewing court err in basing their decision on West Covina given that a statute existed requiring notice of remedies?