Whether the lower Florida state court's error in failing to correctly calculate the date that petitioner's direct review of his case became 'final' deprived petitioner of due process and equal protection

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE LOWER FLORIDA STATE COURT'S ERROR IN FAILING TO CORRECTLY CALCULATE THE DATE THAT PETITIONER'S DIRECT REVIEW OF HIS CASE BECAME “FINAL” IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS COURT'S PRECEDENT IN GRIFFIN V. KENTUCKY, U.S. V. JOHNSON AND LINKLETTER V. WALKER, THUS RESULTING IN THE FAILURE TO APPLY THE STATE HOLDINGS OF MONTGOMERY V. STATE AND LAMB V. STATE WHICH WERE DECIDED WHILE PETITIONER'S CASE WAS ON DIRECT REVIEW AND NOT YET FINAL, DEPRIVED PETITIONER OF DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW AS GUARANTEED BY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. ef It _ LT AN panties appear in the Captor of the case onthe @vee page, [] Ait pasties do nat appear ‘in the captiin oP the Case on the avek pages Related Cases State Vi Perey, ol200f~497 0A Sudqment entered Seph (3,207 Perry Vi Shute r(d10 -137¥ Tndement entered dy 23, 2010 Peary Vi Shefe, iDil4243 Tukimect entered, Apr,27, 2011 Perry V. Skate, iDI80665 | Sidjmend entered. Apt, 3,203 United Stecte, Dist, Court, |-13-CV-WI-MP~GRI, Tadg ment entered Aug. % 2016 Peary v; State, WIR -O79F Trdymerd enfered Tuly 17,2017 Perey v. Dixon, Sey Dept OF, Core, SCA CFO = Fudg nent entered, Tuly W202 Rehearing Deied Fedamerd enkred. AuglD 2022