No. 22-6521
William Randall Brannan v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a general motion under Rule 29 preserves a challenge to venue
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW This Court should resolve the circuit split that has developed by finding that a general motion under Rule 29 preserves a challenge to venue. STATEMENT REGARDING PARTIES TO THE CASE The names of all parties to the case are contained in the caption of the case. Brannan Petition for Writ of Certiorari Page ii
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-23
Motion of William Brannan for an extension of time submitted.
2023-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 10, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
William Brannan
Ralph De La Garza — The De La Garza Law Firm, P.C., Petitioner
Ralph De La Garza — The De La Garza Law Firm, P.C., Petitioner