Whether the California Supreme Court rendered a decision in conflict with the law of the United States Supreme Court announced in Brady-v-Maryland,Kyles-v-Whitley,Pennsylvania-v-Richie

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1) WuiheTHer THE ChUFOeWIA SUPREME COURT RENDARD A DECISION AN CONFUCT WHT THHE Liaw OF THE UNITED Srarcs GuPReME COURT ANNOUNCED I BRADY V. MARYLAND, 373 U-S. 83, 3711963), KYLES v. WHITLEY: SI4U.S. 414437 [19199) BHD, PENUSYLVAN V. RICHIE, 480 U.S. 34, COIS) PLURRUTY OPIVION) WHOU IT DENIED PETITIONER'S BRADY CLAIM ; THAT THE PROSECUTOR 1S SUPPRESSIUG MATERIAL EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE, —— PETITIONER'S CHEMICAL TEST RESULIS ——~ Wd POSSESSION OF THHE Pouce ? 2) WIKETHER THE CAULFORNIA SUPREME COURT REKDARD & DECISION bh COMFLUCT WITH THe Law OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ANNOUNCEID Ins WILLIAMS Ve TRAYLOR, 5249 U.S.420, 430,43412000) WHat IT DENIED PETITIONERS REQUEST FOR Ky EVIDELUTTIARY HERRING UUbER THE PROSECUTOR'S SUPPRESSION OF MIATERIBL EXCLLPATORY EVIDQULE 7