No. 22-6526
Anton Michael Kubica v. California
IFP
Tags: case-dismissal constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence judicial-review material-evidence prosecutorial-delay prosecutorial-misconduct speedy-trial
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the appellant denied his federal and state constitutional right to due process, because of unjustified, prejudicial prosecutorial delay in filing the petition which then resulted in the loss of material evidence necessary to defend his case?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WAS THE APPELLANT DENIED HIS FEDERAL AND STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS, BECAUSE OF UNJUSTIFIED, PREJUDICIAL PROSECUTORIAL DELAY IN FILING THE PETITION WHICH THEN RESULTED IN THE LOSS OF MATERIAL EVIDENCE NECESSARY TO DEFEND HIS CASE?
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2022-10-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 10, 2023)