Whether the ruling in GARZA V. IDAHO 139 S. CT 739 (2019) applies to Plaintiff's Constitutional guarantee?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the ruling in GARZA V, IDAHO 139 S. CT 739 (2019) applies to Plaintiff's Constitutional guarantee? A. Pending judgement (Writ of Cert.) in Supreme Court tolls 2255 from one year of Supreme Court’s decision? B. Would Retroactivity of Garza ruling afford a fair and even application of the 6th Amendment to all citizens but specifically Plaintiff's individual circumstances? 2. Whether a split circuit ruling by 7 and 4" circuit, in not applying Garza creates inconsistences in Constitutional application of Supreme Court ruling? 3. Whether Due Process violations in grand jury testimony and Brady violations would be a miscarriage of justice severe enough to invalidate the entire indictment? 4. Whether Protected Class of citizens with PTSD and comprehension disability can be held to same standard as Government and Attorney's? i.