No. 22-6545
Kamil Hakeem Johnson v. R. M. Wolfe, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge sentencing-discretion sentencing-options statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court had jurisdiction to impose a term-of-years sentence when the statute only provided for death or life imprisonment without possibility of release
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : _“THE DISTRICT COURT WAS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO _ IMPOSE A "TERM OF YEARS" SENTENCE WHEN THE STATUTE : CONTAINED ONLY TWO SENTENCING OPTIONS, DEATH, OR LIFE ; _ -IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF RELEASE . , .THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS REMAINS THE SOLE AVENUE . AVAILABLE FOR CHALLENGING PETITIONER'S ILLEGAL SENTENCE
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-19
Waiver of right of respondent R. M. Wolfe, Warden to respond filed.
2022-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 16, 2023)
Attorneys
R. M. Wolfe, Warden
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent