Whether the Illinois Supreme Court's rule requiring trial courts to ensure that each juror understands the principles of People v. Zehr, 103 Ill. 2d 472 (1984), is consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412 (1985)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ie iY im) TMircis Spier Cosrk Role UID vequves he We con i ee bene | Wore Ww r Yee wer and accepts” carkean € ( o iprinciples heh. cea heart eptens ord acceps! cert 8.0 RNS West 2020) Cafe Soly\, 2012). Ab palsHoner icl tha Mel coort comms eM, ushen th Caled to mroke sure Bech \uror wrdlarstood the principles WN People v. Zetw 408 TIL. 2a 472 AG 9 wee ee ees 2) Plain avvor docks, A . \ ~ cl : COSL. where Koner: . ; asks Ws eat te oon Onder Seely Relence | case, wah the 7 » Plem evvor dochin’, So De Where the ont, Aelavminelton of auy \ \e besed entively on Ws » assessment oP. tha Unlnesses , credits tihg the evidence WS closclay — Belaneed. People v: Gonzales, 204 TL Ppp A> ldsee MIM 26-T7, oe Mi All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page, o oo onl yall parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of “all