No. 22-6549
Anne Marie Jordan v. Historic Log Cabins, Inc., et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-judicial-misconduct democracy-preservation discrimination fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court judicial-misconduct misapplication-of-federal-law misapplication-of-state-law state-law-discrimination supreme-court-review
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari to address issues of criminal judicial misconduct, fraud on the court, and the misapplication of federal and state law with discrimination
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED The case is presented to The Supreme Court of the United States as an opportunity to increase confidence in the United States Judicial Branch, to impart the preservation of authority within democracy, and sustain constitutional rights in the state of South Dakota. REASONS PRESENTED FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI I. CRIMINAL JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT I]. FRAUD ON THE COURT Ill. MISAPPLICATION OF SETTLED FEDERAL LAW AND SOUTH DAKOTA UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW WITH DISCRIMINATION
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-13
Waiver of right of respondent Historic Log Cabins, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2023-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 16, 2023)
Attorneys
Historic Log Cabins, Inc., et al.
William R. Hustead — Hustead Law Office, Respondent
William R. Hustead — Hustead Law Office, Respondent