No. 22-6551
Palani Karupaiyan v. Township of Woodbridge, New Jersey, et al.
Tags: civil-rights due-process judicial-review legal-remedy mandamus municipal-court parental-rights procedural-relief prohibition standing takings writ
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment FirstAmendment
SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2023-04-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's requested writs of mandamus, prohibition, or alternative relief were properly denied by the lower courts
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Petitioner’s reliefs were prayed as Writ of Mandamus or . Prohibition or alternative so the questions were part of three test condition of the Writs. Il.
Docket Entries
2023-04-17
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-03-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-01
Letter from the Solicitor General filed.
2023-02-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 20, 2023.
2023-02-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 16, 2023 to March 20, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 16, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent