No. 22-6582

In Re Elaine Mickman

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-01-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: child-support constitutional-rights due-process judicial-authority jurisdiction legal-procedure legislated-law state-constitution state-court-jurisdiction usurpation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-06-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the state Court violated due-process,constitutional-rights,jurisdiction,legislated-law,state-constitution,usurpation

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the state Court superseded its authority, jurisdiction, and violated the U.S. Constitution, the state Constitution, legislated law, and its own rules by usurping and ordering-away Petitioners’ Constitutional Right to due process? 2. Will the U.S. Supreme Court compel the state Court to restore Petitioner’s rights by vacating, rescinding and nullifying the May 27, 2021 Order and or any other order that infringes on Petitioner’s rights and direct the state Court to expedite conducting a child support hearing?

Docket Entries

2023-06-12
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-05-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-04-20
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-03-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2022-12-15
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 21, 2023)

Attorneys

Mickman, Elaine
Elaine Mickman — Petitioner
Elaine Mickman — Petitioner