Whether the United States Court of Appeals properly affirmed the trial court's improper sentencing of the defendant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(1)(A)(ii) for brandishing firearm in relation to a Hobbs Act robbery where the defendant was neither convicted nor sentenced for a crime of violence or a drug trafficking crime and in which Rule 11 was violated?

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the United States Court of Appeals properly affirmed the trial court's improper sentencing of the defendant pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(1)(A)(ii) for brandishing firearm in relation to a Hobbs Act robbery where the defendant was neither convicted nor sentenced for a crime of violence or a drug trafficking crime and in which Rule 11 was violated? i