No. 22-6587
IFP
Tags: 18-usc-113 40-usc-3112 circuit-split criminal-law federal-jurisdiction federal-prison maritime-jurisdiction special-maritime-jurisdiction statutory-interpretation territorial-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-05-25
Related Cases:
22-6600
(Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether proof that a crime occurred at a federal prison is sufficient to establish the existence of 'special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the United States,' 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether proof that a crime occurred at a federal prison is sufficient to establish the existence of “special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the United States,” 18 U.S.C. § 113(a), as the Ninth Circuit alone has held, or whether the existence of federal jurisdiction depends on whether the requirements of 40 U.S.C. § 3112(c) have been met, as this Court and other circuits have concluded. i
Docket Entries
2023-05-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-03-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 21, 2023.
2023-03-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 23, 2023 to April 21, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-02-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 23, 2023.
2023-02-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 21, 2023 to March 23, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-01-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 21, 2023)
Attorneys
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent