Is it herein shown that the LT deviated from Sufficient Instructions/required sufficient Notice for non-counsel litigants?

Questions Presented for Review: 1. Is it herein shown that the LT deviated from Sufficient Instructions/ required sufficient Notice for non-counsel litigants? 2. Is it herein shown that the LT ( and deviated from (abridged and rendered invalid) Equal protections of the Law, and Due Process Procedurally and substantively against the petitioner’s Constitutional Rights? 3. Is it herein shown that the LT withheld Lawful orders (and caused undue delay) against factors showing the establishment of Prima Facie in this case? And Against factors shown to Not support a Lawsuit Dismissal? a unpaginated 1 of 15 G. fro -30 SCOTUS No. Appeal No. 22-90019 (22-12727) Ms. Jenkins, Beverly A. vs. Signature BRANCH “et al” Case No. ° [verifiable in Petition the 1st unpaginated Pgs.'1-15 and 2nd paginated pgs. 1-15 herein, and