No. 22-6592
James Stacey Harber v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance plea-bargaining section-2255 sentencing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Mr. Harber denied the effective-assistance-of-counsel,due-process,criminal-procedure,habeas-corpus,certificate-of-appealability,sentencing
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 7 1. Was Mr. Harber denied the effective assistance of counsel at the plea and sentencing phase of trial? 2. Did the district court err by denying Mr. Harber’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition? 3. Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals err by denying Mr. Harber’s right to certificate of appealability?
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2023)
2022-07-01
Application (22A1) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until September 3, 2022.
2022-06-25
Application (22A1) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 5, 2022 to September 3, 2022, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent