Whether the Petitioner's claims were properly exhausted and considered by the lower courts

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED e Peace dee attached Kaa Kol Share WAS PE QURLD. \ tf carta CASE SAWS MOCHAEL AYER Ch0-SE' ) TEAL 2540, CSPSa Qoertin . __ \CAREAL. Cie | ° Qvertions Peesexed e 10 No-4 ) ES Mov "“\g¥ USE? a4] " } Krown) |} as We ConlsRessopar Gare CeSvem [Cr 2 ||_ OF \Ak4 FT ond AU zwe Peouisans tween 13 ee oad rane Fan coe ; and } 7 ck a £, || Covers 2 a|yoa) xe wor she OS. Cecie Cover oll MINTH & Eke, *asees Wert Supray Soey 20 P KwVAO One O mA Nk P Man ae . i LL 22 7 Sk “ele — ve ( OKA. 3 LO (ae || Leones I _ | 2 || 2 Stave Cover tlawe ComPerereh “ONE — ° || Zev eu) Wy Mao states tho\eet Covers) 1 )_kKhN aes Couey Compinees +Wwese CTAIMS 8 MOLUN ei\N\¢ ON AU A De. Bevo || Meese Sedeam C7AIMS 5 Ake Nor these 10 CLAAMS POW) COLE NEB NS “3 xlnansted » || Wese 4aiwe CAMS Nou) RQeemitdtel || Ao Ve 2eiser Ww Kepefar caver Fuas |S O% OCTAASE So 16 }fPoe 17 aac || _NO-4) cE AN tNIWWibUal , based oN Gaunt wil_@ Ak . re ZAt eA CALC4 20 UA _UNL4 UNO Catcy Falls ONDEZ THE 2 || “MAN DADS BAe ~ CPETLAL CtLLADE aj “hts same todividval Was we WAYS — x || Onda MAS TO Qost +We ARPLICARLE |do4.) Copte ‘ 4 we Sty WET AW 5 TAN (OBSTONME ~ REROSE: -_ VO ComPc 6 itt “1% USC 7 2142" Cond NSTEA || Aeibezavely Ophkes Pee-TeAC 6] Oererno) Ky ag Fepedar NMereao _ 9 avy, ‘ CENTER LS Ov. n || wet Of Seth amoeba 2 i 13 . | _OBstApeh Dipeerey as A Pesucr of, »/|_ Ave Taeeatcy Beerveh fom cheeeiv, 3 W tl C \ . || COMS\BEZEN = TATE Ad TV ADMIES 24 wav TT Xmpoe-: 27 |} — . . »[¢ Tend of qQoestions eesertes |