Whether the respondents' actions violated the petitioner's constitutional rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED yal pradkite, T * Sarng the respondents | respondent 2 ao nai pq Oop vas CAs ad pr, Lonr rad Meshueggn be CRDIGEY iSungecy Uonoettasion Law firm Yo yenfy he r ner responding Daek fo Prpk proceed wilh i Yee eet thabhers @ lawlirm? ae the farm Was ya is relecrl ong Dy. Dawson Ane +o Dr: Dawson Jat ask yestrons Fo vert he Ya Uke OrDawson rererres poli toner to the Paes Lor represertaren The g westions presented are two ee Gyre \isted below (Thorg Bk pfeeeded (), Ts Medster washoneton llesprtel Corder ond Lheic Quorney ina anel i tu S ard ve ate not tl hye ne resp angen MS diagnosin) petitioner having ovarian aan en ond gortornurs SUV yer’ ), te Washurion fea Plishe SUaH2, Consultatean Dead utmost fae He atone trom, Ttenple 4a” civm did not call pe obfice 0 Sepeefessto Dr: Mecsatonshr Oo Ginger ae] (deabettf "Dr Dawson referred petihoner X8, ie law arm for reepresertant on m Whoolieal el prac