No. 22-6610
Nicodemo S. Scarfo v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure attorney-withdrawal civil-procedure court-appointed-counsel court-appointment due-process en-banc-petition legal-remedy petition-for-certiorari standing withdrawal-of-counsel
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What remedy is available for petitioner, where court appointed attorney is granted withdrawal from filing a petition for certiorari, when the attorney averred to the exact legal question in a petition for rehearing en banc?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED "WHAT REMEMDY IS AVAILABLE FOR PETITIONER, WHERE COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY Is GRANTED WITHDRAWL FROM FILING A PETITON FOR CERTIORARI, WHEN THE ATTORNEY ; AVERRED TO THE EXACT LEGAL QUESTION IN A PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC? Me i 1 , | : | , i 4 } . 1 { t i
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-11-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2023)
Attorneys
Nicodemo S. Scarfo
Nicodemo S. Scarfo — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent