No. 22-6611
Joseph P. Counts v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights cohen-collateral-order due-process jurisdictional-issue legal-counsel notice-of-appeal pro-se standing timeliness urgent-matters
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether district courts must rule on pro se motions regardless of representation
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : |, Wall the Court establish & * bright tine Cle” directing all disteret courts to rule on pro <e@ | motions regardless of whether or not the pro Se httgant 1S represented by Ceunse| SO | long as the mobion fs clearly tHled or headed i AS & motion that Pre the ‘cohen collateral order’ doctrine?’ ads Will the Court ads ust the ‘ Cohen Collatera| Order’ dockeine Ly accomodate ) and allow Por More Lrgent matters to M ove. Comwand on | fates loco tory appeal g . | ;
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 22, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent