Whether the trial court violated the defendant's right to a public trial by removing spectators from the courtroom?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED wid dle telal Guc¢ welede Qahnsers right do fe pu blie tral by remoulng Specdadars from de Cartraam< PedtHaner ™ yes? . LH thy Stake presents in sudblel end evidence of assauld bith fnden¢ do do great baclily hacer les? than murcr does dbo loper Cord (COA) hove de duty to gram Dekrcoa 1S8ve ok Appea| ? Det ndsnté “ Yes “A a Nid the prosecuder tnarsingly infrodvee perdured desdlmeny 7 pe lendent A Yes 4 pid de tal Cort Wolade. hon sons cg ht de be present on 2 aecasfon> 2 Nefenclent “' Yes , sid HeLelal cart deny Johnsen rg het to plesent A cekense by exelucing the Ficst slater sdjerend of 4 witness © pedendiont * Yes” | bas Mghnsen dented A falc dal and Fompactlal Jey by Indte duelng aur dence of lus pater conuvetons % rnNedenchan-“4 Yes 4 pid de tral cart Abuse 548 lescredfon + deny Johnsen 4 Fal dra by mening lanp loner” (ewnrtkB ard guastloning Hoy poidnes 59? DeFen chant “Yes” — lr3 Joknsons dria | consel ine Heol, fac Prallure to netse D an tsSueand did nofendends tneHeot-<et9sre have wen Debanciant “Yes | id te awec (Court Abose iS Descretlon by deny In 1g . dedendants Amended Clelms (I-S) Abdel dhe ddbenrbPrAS 75Y petiton Bas accepted AS Hnely due +0 die prison mail box role 4 pakndont “yes | id He Loer Cort phose HS deseretlon then it Assumed fat witnesses Roc dp dakense were let beok Inte He courtroom whith vicleded toe. debendents Mlokt to 4 publi drial and Le8 i” We > nor partal due to dis AssumpHon | ; Doh encent : Yes” .