No. 22-6613
Robert Nathaniel Brown v. Florida
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process federal-habeas-review habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief sixth-amendment standard-of-review state-court-decisions Strickland-v-Washington
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-03-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state appellate court misapplied Harrington v. Richter
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the state appellate court in this case misapplied this Court’s holding in Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86 (2011). ii B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii
Docket Entries
2023-03-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-01-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 23, 2023)
2022-11-22
Application (22A452) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until January 20, 2023.
2022-11-17
Application (22A452) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 21, 2022 to January 20, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Robert Nathaniel Brown
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner