No. 22-6614
Omar Kashaka Taylor v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: ambiguous-term criminal-procedure criminal-statute due-process jury-instruction legal-principles statutory-interpretation Whether a jury instruction effectively directing a
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an overly broad interpretation of an ambiguous term in a criminal statute carrying severe penalties complies with established principles of statutory-interpretation,due-process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Whether an overly broad interpretation of an ambiguous term in a criminal statute carrying severe penalties complies with established principles of statutory interpretation and due process? 2) Whether a jury instruction effectively directing a conclusion on a disputed element of the charged offense denies a defendant due process? ii
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 23, 2023)
Attorneys
Omar Taylor
Jordan S. Kushner — Jordan Kushner Law office, Petitioner
Jordan S. Kushner — Jordan Kushner Law office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent