No. 22-6615

Robert Jim v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-01-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-admissibility evidence-presentation fair-trial improper-evidence reasonable-doubt sentencing trial-fairness
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court violated Jim's constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial by allowing improper evidence and preventing him from presenting evidence in his defense?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether The Court Violated Jim’s Constitutional Rights To Due Process & A Fair Trial By Allowing Improper Evidence & Preventing Him From Presenting Evidence In His Defense? I. Whether There Was Insufficient Evidence Presented At Trial To Convict Jim Beyond A Reasonable Doubt Of The Charges? Ill. | Whether It Was Plain Error When Jim’s Counsel Failed To Make A Rule 29 Motion To The Court? IV. Whether The District Court Erred In Sentencing Jim To Life Imprisonment On Counts 1 & 2? 2

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-01-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 23, 2023)

Attorneys

Robert Jim
Florence M. BruemmerLaw Office of Florence M. Bruemmer, P.C., Petitioner
Florence M. BruemmerLaw Office of Florence M. Bruemmer, P.C., Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent