Whether the lower court erred in its application of the Ruloyed Cases 995.3 and A

No question identified. : ENE _ EE | Did the Arizena Court of Appeals Division One Ulf by attinm ing the ftipmination of Fathary Parental rights over Ais two biolegical ChilAren in a Maricopa County Superior Count ondep. that dors pot mare any Finding of “paruntal Untitness , aS iS required under the, Duw Process and Egual Profuction Clauses of the 4th Amendment te The US: Constitution and-by this Court in Santesky Vv. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982) 7 Aru Arizona Revised Statutes F 7-533 (t) 8. (a) and (<) @ anh 1S monthS time in=Cane) unconstitutional 45 applied to 4 peatrial Letainee parent, whan they ara Used. a5 the Sele grounds fo Terminate The parental cightS of 4 pretrial detainac parent who is merely accused and is awaiting Trial in the Criminal Court, in Violation : of Har Due Process Clausie of the IY Amindment to Ax US. Congtitution® Are Apizena Revised Statutes F 9-533 (8) 8. (4) and () Unceagpitutionally overbroad. in Violation of Thu US. Constitution ® es} Ape Arizona Revised Stutes 5 3-533 (6)8. (a) and (<) | Unceonstitutionally Vague in violation of Aw U.S. Constitution © les] Did tAw Apizona Count of Appeals Division One erp by at finming ~ the Maricopa County Superiot SP Tovenjle Court > Lenial of fatharr _ank Arizena DCS ‘s motions fon a Continuance of trial due To the highly | Contagious and potentially fatal Covid19 virus, in violation of Fothor's right to fundamentally fair procedures 4, q Termination N parental righty procaaki ny under 1 hee 1H Amand ank Sartosky_v. Kedmess 455 ussite) SSA reply BE MOMS HOP EWU HEFT APS OE AOI SY EE ice “pp Loney wunudny wey AE IE CCS E RL PEP SeyIe we Up She __. a . ' =oZ RE WSe> Of, So rs as Yd Fheo ~oe AD “ON || F¥eeveddy So peg MATT WHBNYY PG I apeiron esp cerca Ta PY PITT AES BIT AORHAS SOPRTOY OPE TREES OIE ML TT PPRORT FOG POPP SOM IOI FITS POSE (MIT LISA ah owt FS COTTIER TLE TIE TIEN LO MIG OD YO eC OL nes eS paper aed: gover pounaaagp pep sy AISTe YP Ie hago arses a Spans ernndag wey AEE OE WTO Fo HIM WIZ MOLY — paid pep kapag ok 7 0 vay YO GONE ENB G = SON a ee $$ ogres} ——— RE re roms epee REIS RIGA VORF MH RBIS ON eure par TOAENILY Farery VoIP vb AG wey AT WOT TO LT a SN a ERE OT WS POTTED Eh prpraIES Fo UTP H UNTIL, BaP OE N= VOT NY SS UG WRTETAID = SIPS FO PINOT BUTT IY ESE FEOF WO PREP MANY VOY VOIP! Yd = SOO = CER NT ONY San 0a5\2o0ia 42 aca | __ {J Apizona Court of Appeals Division One a _ : Ne BCA RSA ROT CeRS _|Fathen = Josiah English ik FilsA. a Pottition Fr Spesial Action — [requesting a Stay of the juvenile: termination of parental ght is Criminal GaSe, On ndel3gene the Arizona Couct of Appesls = Ip vision Ona tiled their “Order Declining Special Action Dirishisction | Pleaser Serva copy of that onhar attachss.a5