Whether the lower courts erred in dismissing the petitioner's case

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED LAS Tis Mr RecAUSE THIS COURT WAS ST ALTEY ALLORODWs (o LETTE or THE LAW TY REGARD [ CASES MD. 21-5935 [MO 2US3S Me Me ACM PIUNLEYCE CALA, TY Willd THis CouRT REFUSES Lo RET VEU oh PRWALO ACSPADEM RATE FTL. YAU ARIE Hole Mt VG WEEE, So EWEN COoME ARE MALTY EYLUSES ABoUT ALS MY LEGAL onic? 1, THEL WLI ME TM CASE Mo. 22 THIS THAT THEY Dood) HAVE Drv Daey. PRUIFD) Pou, THeu PGEC THREE PL THLS GASe, RUC THIET Atle LAWT WTO Prue PEE How CAM D Pat ECL FEC WE E CANT PAY WHAT TD A ReADY OWk? 3, T ALREADY owWE Count FECS LT caw PAT 5p Hor CAW © OG ONSNG) Ys PAY MRE AND MY Cer DIMES LEAWEL ATIC PATOS VWs AWD BE (DULED FoR o1N Cosdt FEE Rut wor THES ONE | & 7ST. WROTE Joe WHERE THAT MoE sWsuld oT teDEL Justrue’l | GTS TS AMSINED LURew se FUL CONLIN, CEIRLAL CRTRANG OFFTLG QUERTURUED THATS CASE, WET DS CoM GIVIM6 ME A NANO THLE ABOU Monet £ DowT WAVE 7,75 Mol THs Count RAGATIVG Youn BEAL, I MEU) Yow OF CASE. MO. U-SI3G. T AM ACTUALY DU MoceV/T, TS THR Mot AVOINER WRWUbEL CoUULUTom THES CALE WAS OueRTURMED &% CENTRAL CREEVANLE OF FHC. . a 3. TAM EMIETLED 1D KELLER TWAS UPLATE, MY CDV Wa REST OTSRESPELTED, EF luls VEY STABR, T MIM) YoU 0 Wo, 22-5975