Whether the government omission of evidence that was contrast affiant's Search Warrant Application (SWA) statements constituted a Brady and Franks violation

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1.) Whether the government omission of evidence that was contrast affiant's . Search Warrant Application (Hereafter "SWA") statements constituted a Brady _ and Franks violation. 2.) Whether an officer can falsify the identity of his informant as another suspected informant to protect the infirmities and falsities of his SWA's | is a violation of petitioner's Fourth Amendment Constitution rights. 3.) For the Court to take an "In Camera Review" of Jerome Wilson's Sealed File. (Federal Number 20719-041) To make the determination of whether government misappropriated the informant in his SWA's and during trial. 4.) Whether affiant of Mayweather's SWA's falsified a controlled buy to substantiate probable cause to search, when he had second hand knowledge that drugs would be stored at Mayweather's resdience. CERTIORART -i