No. 22-6624

Daniel Ray Loyd v. Neil McDowell, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-01-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process felony-murder felony-murder-rule ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions prejudice right-to-counsel state-law-error
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether trial counsel was ineffective by conceding Mr. Loyd's guilt of all charges, including robbery in a felony murder case

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) SOR. Loyd S*onghy SHS F4ai TRi4l C aunsel WAS rn effec Nive Secause 7FRiel C eunse/ Concecded mR. Loyas Guilt oF All Changes (1 Wis <lashg Akgument, gnclacding Kobbery in A 4é/ony rurder 7 7 eek) Rule. CAC, 27%. Loy WAS Aargedk Levies? & Theogy OfFelony myukder. Felony McKee r? Jury rnsthice pion! | 779. Tury Keceived (nshencfions felt ing 7 Felony murkdee tthyeh Sard: The AefencleuiT 7-8 Chakgect 1A Count ore. wrth HuUKRER line & Theory OF felony PnuURaee, 7 6 oe That The atefen dant 7S geilly ok LtKSF kg kee Lott weele under This Theory, THe Aofle rust Rave Thal, ae, The ete ncaur Comm; ACA OK ATR marek JE Lomita A cbbery | Too y The dekenchenT lntencleaA TO Comin’? Koblewy,’ ant 7htee, While Corani ting ow Ot Fem pring. FO Lom} Koblery, The AkeucteT Caused rie Aer} OCF Quether eRSON, Z PeRSor may Le gery oF Felony Mure R every (FE Te. Ki Ih WAS Unita Fentionsl, Aceiter bel 6 eg higent: -~7 Cuestions Pesenkl Did THigl Counsel tnclerrme Fhe feper Fiunetionmg oF The adversarial ,Kotess by Conedding GH ef The Changes mtluding Kobbery in a Felony Shure hrle Sse sa Ars Crasing, AKGUmEe F St ch That the TRAl Carnet be Kelred vgon as Aaving : (kodhuced a JasT Kesute 3 was Petihoner PRejuticed by Counsel's Contediug PIR. Loyal 's CuiJ yn As Clesiiug A Kyument? 4 Dick 7%! Counsel Concecle Riitioner's Guilt oF Felony murders Wher he AlkKnowlecl thet “nk. Loya was Guilty OF Robbery mm Ais E/osing ARgu ment s Z Dia The Strte SK upkeme Court, Gul The Chnted Stvtes DistRitt Conef¢ oF Appess Glong turth The. Minth CUR Cust Cour} oF Ayes Nke GQ EE ISI04 Of Gn ImporR Fant question of Fecters| Lw That has het been , bat Should be, SeHHea by This Coukt wher it Conéludet That 74] Counsel 5 defense Shotegy fo) Conle de JR. lody's Gtr lt eF GH CHaKge 'S in Ars Closing JtkGtmNeIT tiAS in Fhe wide Karage. of Keasonsble beotssons AS shave ‘7 —g Cowes ions bate ser tec MR. Loyd StRongly States Tal 7i2in) counsel Was meffective DY going luith a Claim ef Met Aefeuse Tit wns yal, Because The Elgim of Right clefeuse cles nor Afply when The Contirhand 'S Megalwas JRIAl Counsel zrefbective by gow With an mnvaliad Cefense (Elaivn oF al bone) Thar Arad HoT Aygflly Z WAS TRiAl Counse) zrreffective hy having JAR. Loya 7éstiFy in Supflert+ oF The ClaimoF Right Alefeuse Gnd Jhhen adariabning JAC Jedense because he Carnclucket The Aefevse wAs Mleslicd vi Did the Stete Sugmeme Court and The aled Shetes District Court oF Aypests Glug luith rhe MAPK CiRéis# Coukt OF Aypeels nae GQ ecrsren OF 4 Jen for tart Question ©F Sacte ts) lL4w That AAS Kot been, But Should be, Settled Sy Taig Coa tet, hten r& Concluded Jost 7Ri4) Counsel's Lefense S 1K egy 75 go tuith aun malta C/aie oF Right defense, and hate we. loya Testify pa Segport OF Tht dese Grd Ten aoancenilig That Clkevse ZAI) within The widle Kange OF Kessondble Pkofessional Assis ta nce 3 -3-— Cues trons Lfeesen fed. SIR. Loyd StRongly Sh+tes That TRipl Counsel Wis zrefFectve by gong with & maj Cousstion ana foresee. ahr h ty Defense. SAQ Felony Murder Kule 7Rial, Was 7HiAl Counsel zZHeFFective. by GELI with Gu MVAlid Coussthon ana Farksecab lity Ole fenge. & Felony mukcle? Hicle FRG | Z | Felony (HARA Try zuStKeuchon ya VRt: A person sny be Gurlby oF Felony P44 U kere even iF The Kills VAS anrmtentionsl, Aecicen tal, ok negligent. Did he State SpReme court anct me Uhaited States Dist ict Court OF aypeals hig burt The Ninth cK Cut Couk? OF AgPeHls ruske a Clecision OF an danpok tant Pues tio CF Fecle| Law That has nor Geen , Lut Shialt de, SeHkd by Ths COUR, then They Concluctea Thet TR) Coanse/'s tkfense SIR Tegy 78 Fe with, Guother: nial olefeue Jal! thin The wre Kangeof Keasonrsble PRAessjonal AS Si Stynce Z -4y— Crestrons the sented | WAS Mm. lo yet fhejudreech by FRiw| Counse) 's Slyke Te ASSERT @ Legs! Defense, Zin This C4Se QA Sezont Shooter De kense. hhen The. Cvrcence wins — eveRWhelaime CLG Sean Shook, p1aInly aul SHOST importantly The. FeT THAT The Wie 71m Was Three Feet Aighek

Docket Entries

2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent Neil McDowell to respond filed.
2023-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 24, 2023)

Attorneys

Daniel Loyd
Daniel Ray Loyd — Petitioner
Daniel Ray Loyd — Petitioner
Neil McDowell
Jill M. ThayerCalifornia Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Jill M. ThayerCalifornia Attorney General's Office, Respondent