No. 22-6628
Johnell Lewis Britton, Sr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure fact-specific-reasons federal-sentencing judicial-discretion non-guidelines-sentences procedural-error reasonableness-standard sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-02-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether district courts are required to articulate fact-specific reasons for imposing non-guidelines sentences?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether district courts are required to articulate fact-specific reasons for imposing non-guidelines sentences? i
Docket Entries
2023-02-21
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
2023-01-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2023)
Attorneys
Johnell Lewis Britton, Sr.
Cheri Christine Thomas — Lewis Thomas Law PC, Petitioner
Cheri Christine Thomas — Lewis Thomas Law PC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent