Whether the District Court or Florida Violated Due Process by Failing to Remand for a Violation Hearing, Where the Sentence was the Statutory Maximum

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED yj) Wht Moree Disteicj or Floeich Vioht{ed Due phocess by 4 Fuline To Remeasd for pe Woleatine Herning , Where Me Stasored wns hee AST) SR hl VMshn $Me, o6'U 5 666.690.1095. 0 O52 BOL A Ad GTY/19¢4) Wi ctens, Tigl Com Sel, Frile76 oh veruclpour” For ermal a ie Debaree wibuess, Aarkeol 76 ob 1 ple ToyL MTII0A) FO Ohsniss On seatie Lowe, Zi, eo) 75 THE jlteas, TiRY InSPROCHians, Pw MsAd/s (fice hawt Hie if eh vty ashe 76 poltisé NboIT 3 Hosters OL MMM ym ME 4Li,.f, Z ,, oy, Lar ON Dischuegop W Frrcaen, wal Far} To OSE Cy-ofbly fi he bn, We / Teal thet Beut/ Anve PROVEN TS Chéobaerre FENT IONE Pash, i a Mn fill j the Cmnpn Te Heer of) haar | Cuishbyb sual De Luar m OF Pez TONAE S1XHp, RNG A Merit Wh EM GmbaKeres, ¥ 7 Dé PRUESS TE A Fk Tél. ANON Winey URS Ue, ee M4 a EA Ie Whekeas, bsp 4 CONTE. CV) ort, Inox) etonou, Brees His , ie rh Callicnely eA Ea fe teen wh Ne Kal dea STi AnsT 7 As He ds DISTACT “ther Thirty Yogs OW phe WE a WL. A Te OUAIILE 10 fal lod KLMTUCIKENLTIN 6 F 3 £31,935 (Hh 4, 200) Wheke Cant. fulilfe Teg. 6 ‘Kaal *elpes ral Nfkins 0S, mara LOS FY 9°23, %60 Ith Ge. /92), Aud uhethoc the Bap huce Ais fake 70 I sel ye He Fetal focis Of A Chim of, miLbedgopes of: Hs ComSEL, hs LAE cntole Vcloped keeotd) tnd Sta FE COURT Mplgns UT fob, 539 ts, 41.20, 18d ZA prishigfoe ce 18 0t Fact Hates loud iys holt As CU fae Keak, Hp onlathe Bar Hyd Whethie Lierg | Feglaesl A Motac Hewion Pb BL Cbei/of Ane Shacu Hirt Herh&e Voip would cle dato Chee wo Cone, Chile thet he (3 prwvoeet 0 Yhe Cue nedelcas Kene6d. 8