No. 22-6650

Antonio Rooks-Byrd, aka Abdur-Rashid Muhammad v. Court of Appeals of Nebraska

Lower Court: Nebraska
Docketed: 2023-01-27
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-court civil-procedure constitutional-law due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-procedure jurisdiction standing state-appellate-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-03-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-the-fourteenth-amendment-prohibits-a-state-appellate-court-from-adjudicating-an-application-or-motion-in-complete-absence-of-all-jurisdiction

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits a state appellate court from adjudicating an application or motion in complete absence of all jurisdiction? i

Docket Entries

2023-03-20
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent Nebraska Court of Appeals to respond filed.
2023-01-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2023)

Attorneys

Antonio Rooks-Bird
Antonio Rooks-Bird — Petitioner
Antonio Rooks-Bird — Petitioner
Nebraska Court of Appeals
Eric James HamiltonOffice of the Attorney General of Nebraska, Respondent
Eric James HamiltonOffice of the Attorney General of Nebraska, Respondent