No. 22-6651
Michael Vanous v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure guidelines ineffective-assistance judicial-discretion jury pretrial-proceedings sentencing sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-02-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was defense counsel ineffective in the pretrial proceedings?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW Question 1: Was defense counsel ineffective in the pretrial proceedings? Qestion 2: Was it a violation of the Sixth Amendment to sentence outside the guidelines without a jury present? : . ; : Page j ; : . : Judge James Wesley Hendrix of the United States District Court for ; the Northern District of Texas Lubbock Divisions judgment is under review. In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Gircuit judges Jolly, Jones, ‘and Ho's judgment are under review. 7 ; , , Page ii ;
Docket Entries
2023-02-27
Petition DENIED.
2023-02-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/24/2023.
2023-02-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-01-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 27, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent