Whether the State of Florida violated the petitioner's constitutional rights by using an incomplete and deficient Miranda rights form that did not properly advise the petitioner of his right to counsel and right to stop questioning

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. There is COURT RECORD that in bebveenxt the dime of 2001 (WEST & WEISS ecest year, please See to West v. State of Florida, 876 So. 2d G14 (Fla. AFH DcA Zooey) THE STATE of FLORIDA v. Weiss, 435 So. 2d ito (Fla. 47" oca 2006) acd 2004 CYouR HONOR , COViD You So DEARLY SEE To THE ROBERTS Overturn (re the Gest Overturn il Junot aay? in case year @ Roberts v. Stabe, 874 So.2d 1225 (Fla. ¥™ dea 2004). the Respoodenty 25 using a pre printed inadequate, Consttotional Miranda Rights form that didnot advise of the RIGHT 4o nave a lawyer dbring questioning oe the RIGHT +40 stop the interrogation at any dime questioning “ WEST@ OVERVIEW: 8 ROBERTS @ OVERVIEW:). These cases were : . | DVERTURNED due 40 the in complete, in reign, Miranda advise form USED BY| the Respsndest-i, and, in one instance, 2 mobien was GRANTED tor Vacate of previovS order when it used " Roberts v. Stake, 874 Se. ad 1225, 1226 (Fla4” pen 2004)" (please Soa STATE(WEISS\ at H5) According ly to the jar ys. Constitutional Amendment 3 shovldn’t the State of Florida be obligated to Keep equal the peivileges & protection GRANTED 54 the SAME TIME pF Teis UNLAWFUL FORMS EXISTENCE @ A