No. 22-6663
Steven Janakievski v. Phillip Griffin, Executive Director, Rochester Psychiatric Center
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: collateral-consequences constitutional-rights custody-discharge due-process habeas-corpus habeas-petition insanity-acquittee mental-health mootness standing unconditional-discharge
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is Petitioner Steven's Federal Habeas Petition moot?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is Petitioner Steven’s Federal Habeas Petition moot, now that he has been , “Unconditionally Discharged” from the custody of the Office of Mental Health (OMH)? 2. Is it Constitutional for the State to sentence an ‘insanity aqcuitee’ to a | predetermined *hypothetical prison term’ to be served in a mental institution, for the crime they were NOT convicted of? | 3. Were any of Stevens Constitutionally guaranteed Rights violated by any of . the parties involved? 7 i : 4 co . .
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-14
Waiver of right of respondent Phillip Griffin, Executive Director to respond filed.
2022-12-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 2, 2023)
Attorneys
Phillip Griffin, Executive Director
Andrew W. Amend — New York State Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Steven Janakievski
Steven Janakievski — Petitioner