Whether there is sufficient evidence of genocide, crimes against humanity and forced labor in Xinjiang, China, and whether the Secretary of State has the authority to make such a determination?

Question Presented The case involved 37 defendants, simple facts, complex legal issues, involving civil violations, administrative violations, criminal offenses, violations of the Constitution . It involving multiple constitutional provisions and laws of U.S. , the UN Charter, multiple international conventions, the UN Criminal Court regulations and Chinese laws. It ; involving multiple UN member states, the European Union, Islamic state organization,the UN Human , Rights Office, etc. It is not simply a defamation issue, ; but a matter of interest groups manipulating the executive, legislature, media, think tanks, American society of U.S. and Western world etc. Not only a matter of constitutional rights of Petitioners as united states persons, but also the disinformation and crime of false testimony in Congress and deception of the United States has caused damage to the interests and security of the U.S., but also the chaos and confrontation of the international community, endanger the People of . : the world and human dignity and world peace. It will generate history affected. S.Res.131: “urges the President, the Secretary of State, and the United States Ambassador to the United Nations to simultaneously outlines a strategy to investigate the human rights abuses and crimes that have taken place in the XUAR, collect evidence, and transfer the evidence to a competent court”. This is consistent with the nature of our ; i litigation. It is very regrettable that the judges of the Federal District Court and the Circuit Court refused to judge—find out the facts, apply the law, and uphold the constitutional government. but, they tolerance of crimes against laws and the national interest of U.S., and waiving the constitutional responsibility and the great moral responsibility of human care. This is a serious challenge to America’s most cherished ° mechanism of entanglement and democracy. (1). were there genocide, crimes against humanity and forced labor in Xinjiang ? Is there sufficient _ evidence to support it? Does the Secretary of State have the authority to Determination it? (2). If the Secretary of State does not have this power , His Determination was illegal .Our research conclusion is correct that The so-called genocide and crimes against humanity in Xinjiang, china that are Century scam and international farce that is orchestrated and Propagation by several persons, Contempt ofpeople’sfeelings, andinsulting Intelligence : quotient. This scam and farce have become the laws and foreign policy of the United States towards China. This very endangers democracy, republic, and the rule of law, very endangers the national interests and national security, causes major economic losses to the U.S., causes chaos in the international community, and the United Nations deceived, very damages the cause of human rights in the world and endangers international peace. Should the Courts fulfill their ii constitutional responsibilities to find out the basic facts of the case and eliminate the harm that is being done to the United States? Should this court uphold the Petitioner claim, judicial review of the Uyghurrelated laws? (3). U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and Maryland, Columbia Federal Court refused to try the case concerning the vital interests of the United States and major factual and legal issues in ; the United States and international community. The case is an important federal question, an issue that cannot be resolved by federal law, and the judgment “departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings” and violated the Petitioner’s constitutional right and Statutory Right to Review, Should be this court supervise and correct it? (4). Those responsible for Conspiracy to commit an offense or to defraud the United States and lying to Government Agents in this case’s defendants should be investigated, held criminally liable, and ; support the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law? (5). For the public int